‘Death of a Salesman’, a process of ressurection

Recently, I have gone through a book named ‘Death of a Sales man” by Arthur Miller who has tried to bring about a contrast of feelings of a man who had a long cherished desire to be entrenched in life for bright future by rendering services of a sales man. But as ill luck would have it, he was not being able to reach his goal. The author in this book has allegorized some loss of distinctions of American Society where an honest and sincere man can not fulfill his mission to survive on earth. The book deals with some factors where a man working as a salesman find his fortune illuminated as well as trimmed in respect of money and wealth. The hero of the book is Willy Looman who had taken a job of a Salesman in a reputed industry of America with which he wanted to lead his life with glistening future. In American society, a person who takes the job of a salesman can see his bright lot because; this type of job is very lucrative and fascinating for any people in the so-called civilized society.

In his early age, he has taken the job of a salesman and as such he has seen dreams to be great by creeping up the ladder of ascending in the high strips of social life. But, in this respect, his speculations as applied in his case were implanted on uncertain and out of his doctrines as well as the philosophy of the extreme bent with age. The ideals in which he was being able to reach his goal were utterly the product of different culture and heritage. He had his wife and two sons for whom he was encountered to bring them up in a proper way but all his attempts were in vain due to his honesty and ideal emblem in dealing with his superiors and colleagues. But the people whom he was always ventured upon did not like this discernment. According to the author, he did never adopt unfairmeans to climb the ladder of a good and honorable position from where he wanted to make something constructive for the bright future of his children. Happy and Biff were his sons whom he had uncommon love and affectionate had tried his heart and soul to make them happy in a significant manner. Biff, being his eldest son asked his father to lead life like others inclined to be rich and wealthy over night following the rules to satisfy the superiors in an illegal manner. Willy was a responsible person for which he had never hankered after ill money and rather he led his life in a sophisticated manner with which he had to suffer a lot in both mentally and physically. He worked hard during his lifetime and he had travailed in distant places for the sake of his profession. Arthur Miller was only the personality who understood the modern philosophy of life and the culture as traditionally reflected in the form of social conflicts and contrasts spontaneously. He introduced two trends of conflicts that were of tragedy and the ill treatment of upper class society and their callous gluttony. Death of a Salesman was a play of misfortunes and social conflicts that were accepted by American Society. If we umpire the frustrations and screaming of Willy’s mind, we will find such way of human psychology which is tremendously extensive and critical in due sense of social friction. In this connection, Willy’s life has been personified with flower, leaf, dream and grass by bringing a tremendous metaphor, which show the realms of his long frustrated life.

 

Willy Looman was a silent worker who had created his own world of livelihood for which he had no complaint against the authority responsible for his well beings and rights for survival. He had seen his colleagues very new in the job of salesmanship, but they got promotion and bright future despite their lacking in skillfulness in the profession .He, on the verge of infirmity of age, submitted an appeal to David Wagner, his boss that he would like to get a job of an Office Assistant where he might get mental satisfaction. Having heard this, his boss flew into a rage and informed his inability of doing so and consequently, he was so much agitated that made him swayed to die. In the last part of the story, Willy’s whole life was bedded on wrong persuasion and due to such similar ideology, his eldest son Biff said that his father’s whole life was filled with wrongs. This is a great question for us, which teaches us that no man in this world should be neglected and it is our sacred responsibility to show our best regards for the oppressed people in the society who are down trodden and are suffering from deprivation and ill-treatment of the people who create difference amongst people. Arthur Miller was an author who minutely judged the dissimilarities of social life and tried to reflect in his literary creativity virtually. We claim that we are the citizens of modern society but we don’t care for a man who is really a rare resource personnel to develop our country and whose contribution needs to be recognized by the people who are in power for implementation of one’s model or their realms in particular field. It is our shame that we are afraid to face the challenge of reality, which Willy was unable to win over all misfortunes and injustice like Wagner and others that tidied him. If we look forward the socioeconomic condition of the civilized nation, we will observe that many people are swindled to one’s prey of callous gluttony and tyrannized system of ruling for which he has to suffer whole life and his family. We are the creations of one creator who has urged to establish equal justice and rights of the people but we forget in every step in our duties and responsibilities.

Arthur Miller in his famous book, death of a salesman has intensified the ideals of a real man that are the sole devotees of religion, model of real life situation and moral obligation in most predominating manner. In the society of America, any one can cherish high ambition of bright future after entering in the service of salesmanship but in the case of Willy, the opposite thing happened what had flabbergasted the people of the civilized domain who need reforms of society in a systematic manner. In fine, he had been deprived and deviated from being embedded with higher rank as promotion enjoying social status. The author has criticized American society that with the end of a man’s future, the futures of his other members of his family were nipped in the bud. The author has critically examined the supplication of Willy looman and expressed his comments in favour of his modesty contributing the beauty of life. The author Miller has collected materials from social surroundings where men women relationships and philosophy of reality and the realms of survival are coherent on earth by bringing a factual contrasts of feeling of mankind. He reaffirmed some literary objects in the pages of his mind, which acted like the mirrors of social unrest and evils committed by them. The author has envisaged a different critic who was like a brief candle whose survival depends on a little fuel and when it is finished, he will no more exist on earth. A man burnt with mental distortions can not create his own image in social life because he has travelled in wrong way. In this connection, Robert Frost says,”

“Two roads diverged in a wood,

I took the one – less travelled by

And this has made all the difference “

 

In view of the above, it is obvious that Willy had a separate world to roam about into the shadow of a moving life. He was in the habit of purposing such a manner on the ground that he had failed to switch over the difficulties. The authority wanted him to be punctual in dealing with modern self-absorption that is reflected as the realm of dishonesty and insincerity. I like this book because I have found honesty of Willy’s heart that had not hunched down to the sacrificial stone of the authority of injustice and distortion. Willy’s heart was craving for impartiality and honesty but the people of modern American society had not performed anything good and mundane for his prolific achievement in the society rather they denounced him for honesty and reality towards carrying out his tasks in toto. In this context, a few lines of William Shakespeare are worth mentioning:

 

” Out! Out! Brief candle

A life’s but a walking shadows

A poor player!

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more, it’s a tale

Told by an idiot, it is full of sound and fury

Signifying nothing “

Shakespeare’s poetic diction

William Shakespeare has occupied a great off-planet of poetic diction and it is he who has dimensionally been dedicated to contemplate human conflicts with different critics and psychological aspects of life in a penetrating and blood-and-guts materialization by bringing contrast of feelings for metaphorical representation and reflections of factual events. In his almost all play’s, Shakespeare has correlated the sense of using poems to show the ethics of human conflicts and contrasts by bringing similarities and dissimilarities of human attitudes with the nature and the tremendous beauties of forceful happenings what is ordered and disciplined. In composing sonnet, he has intensified his views regarding nature by bringing contrasts with human conflicts and attitude in question. He was a personality of poetic distinctness with which he was well versed in trimming the common thing into the depth of illuminated realm that is sequentially philosophy of life mammoth, intensive and bedded on wide range of truth and preponderated

As has been reflected in the sonnet XXIX by William Shakespeare, a true love of his beloved with nature has been vividly contemplated in a weighty manner. The poet thinks that his love for his beloved will be never ending. Even, some changes may occur in nature which always show the sequence of transient trend of life. The influences on change-ability of the nature over the earth are melancholy and transitory. Human beings are developed in the earth and flourished through some changes day by day after a short span of time, causing decay and destruction, he dies and his everything on earth is faded away as a symbol transient growth of nature. The poet thinks that he has unlimited love towards his beloved and this love is never changed as the nature changes and develops and withers. The beauties on earth are temporary and as such melancholic strain prevails in its every influence over the plants, environment and the situation that occurs after alteration of the nature. The earth is changing with the changes of nature and his love cannot be changed which is permanently bedded on integrity, peace and faith in his heart. The poet presents a true love, which is uncommon, but illuminating conflagration will occur spontaneously. The nature is encountered with interminable sequence of earthly objects and beauteous emission occurs in the mental attitude of the poet. To speak the truth, the poet has an immense love for his beloved and in exchange of anything it is pure and unparalleled. The poet envisages that due to changes on the nature, his love will never be changed rather it will be hidden forever. In his poem, the theme is ideally judged in terms of allegorical meaning of real love and purity of life. Like wise, in his every sonnet, the critics of men women relationship are the mainstream and these are metaphorically reflected like the glittering rays of the sun. Similarly, Shakespeare’s other sonnet like Sonnet No. XXIII and sonnet No. XXII and XVII respectively, and in this connection, almost same attitude and feelings have been placed as a token of love, sympathy and demerits of love have been vividly contemplated. Of course, Shakespeare has written a number of poems on nature like ‘Under the Green wood tree” where he has expressed the feelings to live under the green wood tree. In his famous comedy,” As you like it”, he has emphasized the importance of nature in the sense that nature in the forest of Arden is the symbol of peace and tranquility of life where the people irrespective of caste and creed can live life long as the best place to live peacefully under the green wood tree. Only there are some adverse materials that are rough weather and winter bare that may focus rough ingredients against dealing normal life. But if a man is accustomed to live in the forest, he may overcome such difficulties easily. William Shakespeare in his almost literary works like Much adieu about nothing, As you like it, A mid summer night’s dream, Othelo, Tempest, Hamlet, Julius Caesar, Cresida and Troilus, Twelfth night etc., has written poems showing the sequence of love, contrast and conflicts of life.

The poet Shakespeare has given priority to reflect something on the expansion of morality of human beings as envisaged in his famous book, ‘Measures for Measure’ and in order to flourish it; he has emphasized the beauty of life’s race and its widespread implication of love in a significant manner. These are tremendously influenced in the story because Shakespeare knew the beauty and ornaments of life and as such he has applied the sense of sophistication and responsiveness in his characters. Indeed, his poems are the sources of inspiration of life from which he has drawn a nice contrast in every of his creativity. It is really a basic rhyme when Shakespeare creates a message of sympathy and inspiration. Hence the poet says,” Cowards die many times before their deaths, the valiant never taste of death but one’. In his famous sonnet,” Crabbed age and youth”, he has carefully thought about the actual entity of youth envisaging the rhyme that youth is the source of all happiness”. In this poem, the prolific readers know the consequences of old age that is a bar to progress and prosperity of life. But Shakespeare says that youth is like a summer morn where age is nimble and winter bare. In Shakespeare’s poem, the universal demand of life is the increasing attitude of its own dimension reflected as bright object of scattering every where to substantiate all hopes and aspirations of life. The poet has sometimes extended his writing towards insignificant shadow of black cloud in the sense that love and fraternity are precondition to achieve bright future of life and its pattern of explicit criteria lie in between merits and demerits. In Macbeth he has shown that over ambition is a dangerous thing and he says the following statement, which are pedagogical aspects in the silent world envisaging a clear stream of reason in the wake of a shadow which is trimmed and idealistic in the eye of real personality worthy of skeptical and inquisitiveness.

” Out! Out! Brief candle

A life’s but a walking shadows

A poor player!

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more, it’s a tale

Told by an idiot, it is full of sound and fury

Signifying nothing “

In view of the above, it is obvious that the poet’s love is heavenly dedicated which lies forever. It is neither perishable nor changeable. According to him, his perpetual and happy love always remains in his inward eye, which reveals the utmost sphere of livelihood. His life is without love for his beloved does not show any significance of real life in due sense. In Hamlet, Shakespeare has ideally applied the sense of human conflicts that are basic strategy of life. He has presented his Hamlet in different literary feelings and philosophy of life by applying various rhymes of poems to retaliate real life situation that envisage the critics of human contrast and conflicts as the reflections of social problems. Hamlet is the name of an actor where the lines of poems as resorted by Shakespeare are animated, relevant and furthermore; these are tremendously favourite in the eye of the prolific readers who are the critical devotees of Shakespeare. It has duly stirred the heart of the readers in view of its beauty of truth to expand the maxim of human problems and its widespread solutions. William Shakespeare was the greatest author for all times. He was the only personality who had scrutinized firstly the dimension of human psychology and added the increased truth of beauty inside the literary feelings. In Hamlet, he had critically examined the philosophy of human conflicts and tried to bring about a change in between the critics of men and women by way of poetical diction.

Shakespeare’s Hamlet has been bequeathed as a token of ideal personality who had tried to his utmost heart to enlighten his inquisitiveness feelings about his father’s death. He was dumbfounded to see the uncle’s behaviour for his marriage with his mother. He was mentally tormented with thoughts about his unusual departure from this ephemeral world. He was informed about his father’s death but it was falsely implicated. Despite this darkness, he came to learn about his father’s killers by way of the ghostly spirit of his father. But he was found restless in the state of meticulous suspicion about his father’s death. So he arranged to act a play ‘ The murder of Gongago’ where the facts and the critics of the drama will cause the killers predominated to understand their reactions of mind for commission of crimes which was heinous in the eye of a healthy society. There after, he was confirmed about the culprits of his father who left him desolated like unseen and unknown about what had happened to him. He promised to take revenge against them – Claudious and his mother. His famous remarks are widely vibrated towards the audience greatly. He uttered to his utmost heart as an outcry of his feelings for survival on earth. ” To be or not to be, that is the question”. He was dedicated within himself that he would either die or live in taking revenge. He had delayed to revenge in the sense that he was suffering from indecision.

Shakespeare’s senses of application in composing sonnets and other poems are unparalleled in the realm of poetic world. Normally, a sonnet is a poem of fourteen lines, which is full of emotion and deep thought. Shakespeare’s sonnet has a unique entity, which show the sequence of universal quest of love, fraternity, enmity and human contrast in a systematic way. Shakespeare was only the personality who understood the modern philosophy of life and the culture that traditionally reflected social conflicts and contrasts spontaneously. He introduced two trends of conflicts that were of tragedy and the play within tragedy. Hamlet was a play of misfortunes and social conflicts, which were accepted by the then social conditions and the crisis as reflected in his play for accelerating the basic strategy of life. William Shakespeare has been successful in reflecting human contrast and feelings of love universally in creating separate world of poetic diction.

A Tale of two cities’, a process of resurrection

Dickens wide pattern of touching characters emphasizes the virtues of sacrifice, comprise, charity, and allegiance and overall resurrections of the age of flourishing modern culture and society. The feelings for the despondent, which he deliberates in his stories, made me one of his fans and he became my favourite author. Charles Dickens was born in 1812 and is still a popular English novelist amongst the prolific readers of the world in the sky of English literature. He was born to John and Elizabeth Dickens in a small terraced house at 1-mile End terrace, Land port, Port Sea on 7th February 1872. The house is now a museum where his houses, furniture, books, couches and many other articles used by him is being manifested on which he died. At the age of 5, his family moved to Chadman in Kent and then 5 years later to Camden in London. In 1824,when his father was imprisoned for debt, he was sent to work at a Warren’ Blacking factory at Hunger ford market. This was a very unhappy period in his life and when his father was released, he attended day school. Three years after he had acclaimed to work as a solicitor’s clerk, he had joined as a freelance reporter at Doctor’s Commons Courts where he had made his names reputed by presenting many articles on social conflicts and the reformation on prejudicial environment prevailing in the then society. On 2nd April 1836, he married Catherine Hogarth, the daughter of his friend. He died in 1870. I like his books because in his novels, Charles Dickens has created crisis and recapitulated the repercussion of his actors and actresses, which have been reflected as a process of resurrection. I like this author’s books because he had contrived history in his novels and in the light of the history, the framework of the stories has been highlighted as a process of rebirth of human societies.

This story has been designed in the background of French revolution and post war situation in France has been vivaciously contemplated in a significant manner. In every time, the crisis has been created and as such the deadly outcome has been vividly reflected. The main characters of the story are Dr. Mannette, Sydney Cartoon, Lucie and Mr. Darnay. In this story, Ever Mondes’ brother who willingly tormented the happy life of Dr. Mannette and have swindled Dr. Manette to conspiracy. Dr. Mannette was living peacefully in Paris with his practice. Once upon a time, one Evermond brother informed him that a girl was lying like dead in a certain place. Dr. Mannette immediately went there and found that Evermond brothers being homicidal had disgraced the girl and in order to save her, a boy came forward to rescue her but he was also shot dead. Dr. Mannette submitted a detail report to the government against the Evermond brothers. But the case actually went against Dr. Mannette. That is to say, Manette’s life was jeopardised by the cruelty of the two brothers, which was totally inhuman and not allowed by the civilised society. On a trial of a judgement Dr. Mannette was sentenced imprisonment for long eighteen years. After long imprisonment, he was released from the jail in such a time when he was only a broken hearted person both in body and mind.

Even the life of Lucie, who being Darnay’s wife not unhindered from tragedy, due to the fact that she had lost her mother when she was still a child and in such state of distorted attitude; she had never seen her father who lay languishing in the Bastille. At that time when she united with her father, she has steadfastly looked after him due to his unusual contorted condition in both physical and mental. Her husband Darnay was also a tragic character in dealing with trials and tribulations in course of his life. He had given up all his clams in the midst of unbounded crisis in France and had immigrated to England where he had settled down permanently. At that time he found no pleasure anywhere in Paris even in England. He was put on trial at the old Bailey on charge of treason. He had spent 15 months in prison before he was put on trial. He was acquitted and released from the charge of treason but he was afterwards re-arrested, retired and this time, he was sentenced to death. It was Sydney Cartoon who made Darnay possible to be survived on earth and in this work he had to inflict unbounded troubles and mental afflictions and despite that, he tried heart and soul to remove mental afflictions from the distorted people at that time.

In the book ‘ A Tale of two cities’, out of all characters, I like Sydney Cartoon who had dedicated his life for the cause of others and who has been shop-worn by fighting against misfortune and evil doings in the society. At the outset of the story, we identify him as an aimless man who had no purpose to furnish or uphold anything to survive on earth. As he himself indicates in the sense that life is coherent within his shadow of moving before it has stuttered. Speaking to Lucie, he says that he is like a beam that dismantled him in the state of being young and innocence like the new born leaf and dreams of human beings. He finds nothing without frustration in life and every where crises have been created to discard such personality not to win actually on earth. He has explored that the brightness of life has been extinguished from where he did not find any clear path of light for which he can impart verdict against all sorts of corruption and misdeeds. He was frustrated to a great extent in such a manner that he has grasped wholeheartedly for salvation from evil doings in the society in such a state from which he could not be able to switch over the difficulties faced ahead. Due to the fact that his conscience was so depressed that he had nothing to do except displaying his state of being hallucinations in the public square. He took Darnay’s place in the prison and having rendered unconsciousness has been able to carry him outside the prison. He cheerfully mounted the scaffold to bestow his life for the sake of the husband of the woman whom he has loved all the time. He was a man of peace loving and he died like the valiant fighter who does not know the consequences of a handicapped personality remaining in deep sleep. Like the Jesus Christ, he claims that he was the symbol of resurrection and renunciation that cannot rest from travel rather he would like to embrace death like a man of rebirth and renaissance

The heroic self-sacrifice of Sydney Cartoon raises him greatly in the profound appraisement of the prolific readers and indeed by virtue of his hardihood and controlled life, he presided Darnay as the hero of the time because he came to Paris with a definitive purpose of saving a life of a servant who has been sentenced imprisonment for life long. As a tentative flow of the story, the sacrifice of Darnay and Sydney Cartoon leads the story as a gender tragedy, which is uniquely ornamented for intensive reflections of the realm of reformation of life and evil critics in a systematic manner. ” A tale of two cities” is the second historical novel of Dickens and when he wrote this novel, he was extremely mentally disturbed on account of the critical domestic situation and the separation from his wife. The writing of this novel provided a kind of outlet to him for his pent-up feeling and had a strong restorative effect on his disturbed emotional stigma. The central theme of the novel is resurrection which takes different forms that has a religion connotation and calls up the general image of Christ rising on the third day of crucification from the grave which acquires a secular meaning, in addition to its religious connotation. Every level of it is permitted by resurrection. The people on earth want peace and prosperity even though they commit crime. To the eye of almighty, the super power of the world, everything is worthy of forgiving except committing crimes like the authority who ignore the actual crimes like sending Manette to Jail and imposing death penalty to Lucie’s father. The wrongs and the blunder are the critics of murky world and as such sincerity and honesty does not move side by side and this world seems to be beautiful with the mixture of the two. But in real sense, one who is honest and sincere needs to get salvation from the hands of injustice and corruption. The adjustment between the two is virulent which Evermondes brothers repeatedly and inadvertently had committed crimes and these phenomena are not acceptable by the critics of the natural force regulating the common activities of men and women. So, the evils committed by them were not inclined to forgive.

Though, Sydney Cartoon was regenerating and had an ultimate object to get rid of from the hands of the then authority judging the innocent like Darnay and Manette, but in the eye of real judgement, the culprits of those tyrannized people their his past behavior in question. But Sydney’s process of regeneration has created a miracle history in the book ‘ A Tale of two cities’ to cultivate the strength and power of spiritual world. But specifically, the role of Sydney cartoon and Darney envisages the realm of rebirth for the people who are conversant with the arena of true event of the ideal perspectives. Resurrection is at the very beginning, introduced through the rambling of Mr. Lorry by the mail coach to Dover, sends message to Tellisons band through the messenger, Jerry Crunchier. The words of Mr. Lorry ” Recalled to life” are of great significance in the story of the novel and Mr. Darnay’s attitudes towards feeling of life give resurrection in order to bring contrasts of human beings for which Dickens created crisis by his characters and had tried to solve the critics of life in a systematic manner. The facts that have been contemplated in the story are actualized to reflect the beams of human race where there is no symbol of life for which the prolific readers get a perspective criterion of human psychology and the critics of human mystery in toto. In this context, a remarkable statement of Somerset Maugham is worth mentioning,

“It is difficult to pass over the razor’s edge,

But the wise say, the path to salvation is hard “

Dr. Faustus, a moral fiber of reforms

Christopher Marlawe, a Pre-Shakespearean poet and author whose great achievement is Dr. Faustus where he has tried to enlighten his historical background in flourishing a great success in the field of religion and resurrections of life which revolutionized a tremendous but wonderful age of science, religion, divinity and renaissance. Dr. Faustus’s soul has been come down to this ephemeral world as a shower of deadly sins and some aesthetes of reforms of human society. Dr. Faustus was an uncommon talent in the sky of Divinity, philosophy and psychology in Utenburg University in Germany for which he had had the recognition of the world as a rare personality. Having observed such divinity and brightness in his soul, Lucifer grew jealous of him and thought within himself that he would purchase the soul of Faustus in exchange of giving 24 years kingdom in the world.

Afterwards, considering positive views, Lucifer had sent proposal to Dr. Faustus through Mephistopheles by visualizing that he would take pleasure from the world, as he would like to do so for fulfilling his mission by committing deadly sins, as he deems fit. Afterwards, Dr. Faustus circumstantially carefully thought about the proposal of Lucifer and asked Mephistopheles regarding the creation of the world. In reply, Mephistopheles informed him that Lucifer had got all sorts of preeminence to control over hell and he wishes to invite him to the hell by way of a deed. Faustus further asked the deputy of Lucifer about the creation of the world and the heaven. Mephistopheles did not say any single word regarding this and remained silent for a while and after that he went away. In the next day, Mephistopheles came and tried to realize his consent and having heard this, Faustus had given his consent and determined to sign the bond and aftermath one-day, he had signed the deed. During 24 years kingdom, he had committed seven deadly sins and he had enjoyed the world, as he had liked to do so as he had murdered uncountable people to satisfy his wrath, sloth and blood appetite.

In the next, his evil doings were very fatal and jeopardized the lives of the people. He had destroyed houses after houses to make his shelter permanently on earth like heaven. He had tasted every crime and promoted his soul as the souls of devil which tantamount to the work of Lucifer, the so-called owner of hell. The logic that has worked in the heart of Faustus is that being supremacy, he must try to master every impossible things into possible and within his own jurisdiction and even he had learned the murky world, which was out of enlightened world. His quest of knowledge was perfect in the sense of insincere and dishonest mood not in ideal perspective ideology. During the course of that time, Christopher Marlowe was of uncommon talent in using blank verse in creating an epic tragedy type of literary works where one man’s achievement and life styles would be vividly expressed. Marlowe found truth in using blank verse that in every of the facts and figures envisaging the ups and downs of the actor must be stigmatized or honored by his fate and fortune. In the context of Dr. Faustus, Marlowe has tried to reflect the following critics, which are the miracle history through out the whole world.

Religious flow: In order to be enlightened properly one needs to be conversant with religion. Marlowe has tried to show this criteria and has reflected the basic strategy which are hidden and flourished in course of time by utmost efforts and hardihood in a systematic and exemplary manner. To speak the truth, Dr. Faustus has administered ‘Black Art’ which are the murky world and the people through out the world practice it to flourish a relationship with lively and mortal soul. He had tried to establish such maxim of scientific research in order to spread his craftsmanship in cultivating the dark world. He has explored some magic spells with which the departed souls surround him with the message of good fortune and bad fortune.

The process of resurrection: Dr. Faustus is the portrait of evil soul as Marlowe has tried to show and reflect the critic attitude of lamentation and regeneration through thick and thin. He had committed seven deadly sins from which he was not absolved. He did not know the creator while signing the bond with Mephistopheles but in the end as a token of tragedy; he came to learn the actual mystery of creation of the world and the existence of Lord. He begged apologies to God and had tried to exonerate from the punishment of hell but his soul was ultimately handed over to the hands of Lucifer, supreme power of hell. According to Lucifer, he is right in the sense that he had purchased Faustus’s soul in exchange of 24 years kingdom in the earth for which Faustus agreed happily and had ruled over unduly in the earth, which was in no circumstances recognized in the eye of honest personality. During his ruling, he had never tried to learn the existence of God, which he became conversant in the last part of his life.

Faustus had created a miracle history in the world in the perception that he had committed crime in such a manner, which were the extreme and deadly affairs from which one can never get rid of. Due to the fact, God has created the human beings to applause him to beautify the earth by their bestowed knowledge and skills whatever he would learn during his lifetime. But Faustus, being uncommon genius, he had spent his life through darkness and evil manner and as such, despite his regeneration all his hopes and entreaty had been nipped in the bud. This is tremendous tragedy that has been created by Marlowe for which consequences were very mischievous and fatal.

The fact is that Dr. Faustus learned the real logic of knowledge but he applied the sense of divinity and perfection in complete evil manner. This is the difference between an evil person and a good person. Hence Somerset Maugham says,

” It is difficult to pass over the razor’s edge,

But the wise say, the path to salvation is hard”

In view of the above, it is obvious that Dr. Faustus became lamented and whatever attitude and feelings had been expressed in the next for remission of punishment envisage the basic needs of the earth. The people on earth want peace and prosperity even though they commit crime. To the eye of almighty, the super power of the world, everything is worthy of forgiving except committing crimes like Faustus. The wrongs and the blunder, that is the murky and the honesty go side by side and this world is so beautiful with the mixture of the two. The adjustment between the two is fatal which Dr. Faustus repeatedly and spontaneously had committed and these phenomena are not acceptable by God. So, the evils committed by Faustus were not inclined to forgive. Though, he was regenerating and had an ultimate object to get rid of from the hands of Lucifer, but he could not be able to come over the difficulties because his deadly sins had not permitted him to leave his past behavior in question. But his process of regeneration has created a miracle history to cultivate the strength and power of spiritual world.

Dr. Faustus was an uncommon talent and his knowledge in almost every branch were undoubtedly the realm of truth and good harvest in the eye of universal perfection. Lucifer, the veteran devil having seen the trend of divinity and real soul had sent him to hell by deteriorating him in the darkness of evil doings. The force that has been intensified in the backbone of Faustus was embedded on mischievous debris and heinous conspiracy by Lucifer. The fatal consequences of Faustus show the human society how to lead his life in ideal manner. The teachings of human beings that we achieve are particularly logical for real life to enter into the path of truth and the actual rhyme of salvation.

A farewell to Arms, my favourite book

Earnest Hemingway’s spacious articulation of poignant characters underscores the virtues of sacrifice, judgment, charitable trust, and commitment and on the whole rebirth of the age of prosperous up-to-the-minute progression of facts in view of social conflicts. The feelings for the despondent, which he deliberates in his stories, made me one of his fans and he became my favourite author. Earnest Hemingway was an author of such critical time where the People were intensively depressed in skepticism, wants, intolerance and overall engaged in unlawful and mischievous activities like bribing, prejudice, jealousy and war on earth for which the burning question of the day was to survive for lively-beings in the midst of crisis. Notwithstanding such critical exigency, the people were burning desire for love; commiseration and flexibility like rest, recreation and peace. In the midst of war, crisis, hunger, criticism and cruelty were prevalent in the society and even every one in that derogatory moment was craving for love and tranquility of life. In that hypercritical state of literary distinctness, Hemingway has been committed to reflect war with love in a consequential manner. Hence, he had accepted a great provocation as his utmost efforts to avoid evoking, a specified or committed response in the mind of the prolific readers. He has presented the facts in most impartial manner which is feasible in order to convey the truth of enlightened encountering and consequently to inspire the people in most vigilant emotions. Unlike many authors who direct the reader’s attention through the use of many symbols and critics or by the representation of facts in a painstaking order, Hemingway has followed the simplest objective form and attitude in his literary renunciation. ‘ A farewell to Arms ‘ is the best creation of Hemingway who has tried to enlighten the necessity of love that is universal in the midst of war, crisis and intolerance.

In the first book of the novel, Henry meets up Catherine and is afterward wounded in the battle. The second book envisages the love affairs between Henry and Catherine, which blossoms during their time together at the hospital in Milan. The third book is devoted to the retreat from Capuretteo, climacteric with Henry’s desertion from the Italian Army. The fourth book deals with Henry’s fight to Stresa and then their lively-beings to Switzerland with Catherine. The fifth book represents the couple’s pastoral life in Switzerland, eventuating unexpected mental afflictions with Catherine’s death during child’s birth. Both of the phenomena relevant to love and war have been vividly and carefully thought about in the first book, preparing the readers for Henry’s eventual farewell to war in the third book and the termination of love in the fifth book. The Book II deals exclusively with love and this is balanced by the similar theme in the fourth book. The third book develops the war plot and represents both the turning points for Henry and central swivel in the potting the novel.

 

There is a development in the character of Henry over the course of his preoccupation in the World War I and his love affair with Catherine. At the out set of the novel, it is obvious that Henry while being antagonistic for life as well as for want of a nail, does not fully understand the horrors of war, nor does he understand the final reality of death. Henry has conspicuously lost some of the idealism that influenced him charitable for the army but having observed death from somewhat limited perspective of an ambulance driver, he was still unable to fully understand the meaning of death. By contrast, Catherine was introduced as one whom, having recently lost her fiancé to the war, possesses a dear insight of the inviolable finality of death. Seemingly, Henry does not function well in the whirlwind existence of disorder and confusion. His basic desire to derive some code of life can be seen as the motive that first prompts him to pursue Catherine. His reactions to Catherine are at first physical, since he would prefer to sleep with her than to go to the army brothels. But, as he becomes more and more involved with Catherine, he sees in their relationship, a type of order, a type of commitment to a regular existence. In this context, Earnest Hemingway has tried to reflect the necessity of morality as well as universal love, which may be treated as an inevitable critic in between men and women. When Henry has profoundly observed the Haling army in chaos, he feels no more allegiance to what has become an abstract organization. In contrast, he feels a deep sense of loyalty to Catherine. In his love affairs, he has dedicated his lives for his beloved, he can discover a sense of duty, a sense of order, and can develop a code by which he can survive on earth with true belief and utmost care. But Henry is unable to deviate himself wholly from the bonds of the traditional order. Even though he disserts the crumbling Italian army to save his own life, he is nevertheless unable to reconcile himself to the fact that he is not a traitor. Catherine, however, is not concerned, since patriotism and loyalty are, in her view, merely the bogus value adopted by others. The war is not theirs’ the only reality is the love that survives for them as individuals. Unlike Henry, Henry has succeeded in isolating herself from any sense of obligation to the conventions of society. Catherine is presented in the beginning of the novel as immersed in the dislocation of personality that results from a lamentable personal loss; her fiancé had been killed in the war. What started out as casual wartime affair is transformed into a love that returns to her a sense of the beauty and significance of life? Her devotion and concern for her lover are absolute. She takes all the night shifts- the most taxing in the hospital to be near Henry. When there is a question of her accompanying her lover on leave, it is clear that no professional commitment to nursing will be able to keep her from going with him. For Henry she is that unique human being whose prime necessity power consists in the ability to make a home out of the most rigidly uncompromising places. She has no pleasure but in her lover, no thought of life outside of his ‘ you’re my religion. You are all I have got” The Priests religion is his clear, cold country, Catherine’s religion is her love. Henry begins, particularly in his relation to women and love, from a completely self-centered position. On his leave early in the novel, Henry goes to the city and immerses himself completely in the self-satisfaction. As it is pointed earlier, he signifies the realm of ideal love and sympathy by contrast and conflicts in a significant manner.

The trap of death is sprung in book V. Catherine’s parturition is difficult, and the birth when it does come is finally performed through a caesarian operation. The child is born dead. Catherine herself dies soon afterwards. Yet, though, it is Catherine, who dies “A farewell to Arms” is not her tragedy She does not become commendable in her dying; she remains in the state of being estimation according to the rules of comportment which the author has set up. Catherine had the perception of death early. But it had come to the notice of Henry only since learning of the doctor’s fears. Catherine knows intuitively that she is going to die. Henry senses it, but his reason will not allow him to accept it. Hence heart felt screams are echoed from the core of his heart.

” I knew she was going to die and I prayed that she would not. Oh! God, don’t let her die. Oh! God, please don’t let her die. I’ll do anything for you if you don’t let her die”

In this book, Hemingway has shown that love is not only present in sweet heart but also preponderates in the midst of cruelty during war. In the wake of misfortune and bafflement of war, sufferings of humanity and overall misfortunes of the wounded, love and fraternity lie side by side. In order to serve the humanity, the doctors and the nurses’ stand in their weal and woe. By dint of knowledge, education and hardihood, one becomes conversant with the reality and conflicts of life. In the battle of waterloo, Napoleon sought peace in the midst of destruction and misfortunes of the defeated soldiers. Florence Nightingale was being able to understand the service of humanity in the limitless troubles of the wounded soldiers lying in the battlefield. She afterwards had had the recognition of the world as a rare personality to continue efforts for the service of humanity. Madame Teressa had spent her whole life for the cause of humanity. She was a symbol of good mother who had contributed a lot to the service of humanity. The persons who are peaceful, sober, create awareness for service to the humanity are the rare personalities to get relieved from mental distortions by active intervention of others. Man is a social being and as such he has to dedicate himself for the cause of humanity as the specific job of an ideal personality in this ephemeral world. A man who is fighting for a just cause is always a great man being a symbol of real peace and perpetual happiness in the eternal world.

In the book, ‘A farewell to Arms’, Earnest Hemingway, has found a truth of maxim that love is really universal beam of light like the glittering flame of the sun which is beautified being coherent with the absorption of infra-red radiation and which created suffering by its utmost potentiality of mental distortions. Henry’s heart has stirred to a great extent due to immature departure of Catharine from this ephemeral world. He has understood that man’s life is ornamented with the perfection of human knowledge. He believes the theory of human imperfection of knowledge and so, he is fickle- minded in nature. Henry thinks that he has achieved the base of life due to love of Catherine who has directed the way to lead life controlled and cleanly. He had observed corruption, falsification, bribing, and tortures of the innocent people that made him bewildered self-centered and deviated from soldier’s life. At that time, according to him, army life was such where cruelty and rudeness were the prime factors to lead their separate entity. When he was involved with Catherine’s ideology, he had to turn over a new life, which was filled with the dreams of bright future ahead.

 

Hemingway has occupied a great off-planet in the sky of modern novel and it is he who has dimensionally been dedicated to contemplate human psychology with different critics and sensible aspects of life in a penetrating and blood-and-guts manifestation by bringing contrast of feelings for metaphorical representation and reflections of factual events. In his almost all novels, he has correlated the sense of using different strategies of love as enunciated with cruelty and to show the ethics of human conflicts and contrasts by bringing similarities and dissimilarities of human attitudes with symbolic ethics and the tremendous beauties of forceful happenings what is ordered and disciplined. In ornamenting different characters, he has intensified his views regarding nature by bringing contrasts with human conflicts and attitude in question. He was a personality of philosophical distinctness with which he was well versed in trimming the common thing into the depth of illuminated realm that is sequentially a criterion of critical study of life being mammoth, intensive and a realm based on wide range of truth and preponderated. It has duly stirred the heart of the readers in view of its beauty of truth to expand the maxim of human problems and its widespread solutions. Hemingway was the greatest author to ornament the characters in modern diction with regard to definitive situation in the realm of ideal sequence of life.. He was the only personality who had scrutinized firstly the dimension of human psychology and added the increased truth of beauty inside the literary feelings in most objective manner. That is to say, the author has tried heart and soul to intensify war with love by contrast, conflicts and representation of metaphor with critical realm of the sphere relevant to socioeconomic condition at that time virtually.

In this connection, a few lines composed by Benjamin Franklin, an American statesman, scientist, inventor and a famous author is worth mentioning:

” For want of a nail, the shoe was lost

For want of a shoe, the horse was lost,

For want of a horse, the rider was lost

For want of a rider, the battle was lost

For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost

And all for want of a horseshoe nail”

 

Life story of William Shakespeare

William Shakespeare was not only the name of a play writer but also, he was a versatile genius in the sky of English literature who led his pen through out the intensive problems of human beings irrespective of castes and creed and even with his gallant touch, the common phenomena of human societies have been reflected in a systematic manner. As he has entered in English literature as a Play Writer but he has thought about the poetic diction in the world which speaks about the nature, love and the superiority of natural aspects virtually. In his flow of writing, he has included all sorts of literary contents very tactfully and used his dialect in the creation of world literature for which he had had the recognition of the world as the greatest author and dramatist.

William Shakespeare was born at par Avon in Stratford where he was brought up and so far it is learnt that his father was a carpenter in a Weaving factory He received his primary education from Stratford and afterwards, he joined to a drama club from where he had started his career as a play writer. Afterwards, he had written a number of world class books on English literature out of which King Lear, Hamlet, Macbeth, Troilus and Cressida, as you like it, Julius Caesar, Anthony and Cleopatra, Measures for Measure are the greatest. In every of his literary creations, he added the dimension of poetic diction and thus he ornamented his literary stringency with full aspects human problems and their solutions. His poem in English literature is unforgettable because he has brought the contrasts of feelings in between man and nature. As has been reflected in the sonnet XXIX by William Shakespeare, a true love of his beloved with nature has been vividly contemplated in a significant manner. The poet thinks that his love for his beloved will be never ending. Even, some changes may occur in natures which always show the sequence of transient trend of life. The influences on change-ability of the nature over the earth are melancholy and transitory. Human beings are developed in the earth and flourished through some changes day by day after a short span of time, causing decay and destruction, he dies and his everything on earth is faded away as a symbol transient growth of nature. The poet thinks that he has unlimited love towards his beloved and this love is never changed as the nature changes and develops and withers. The beauties on earth are temporary and as such melancholic strain prevails in its every influence over the plants, environment and the situation that occurs after change. The earth is changing with the changes of nature and his love cannot be changed which is permanently bedded on integrity, peace and faith in his heart. The poet presents a true love, which is uncommon, but illuminating conflagration will occur spontaneously.

According to William Shakespeare, the nature is encountered with unbounded sequence of earthly objects and beauteous outpourings occur in the mental attitude of the poet. To speak the truth, the poet has an immense love for his beloved and in exchange of anything it is pure and unparalleled. The poet envisages that due to changes on the nature, his love will never be changed rather it will be hidden forever. In this poem, the theme is ideally judged in terms of allegorical meaning of real love and purity of life. It is obvious that the poet’s love is heavenly dedicated which lies forever. It is neither perishable nor changeable. According to him, his perpetual and happy love always remains in his inward eye, which reveals the utmost sphere of livelihood. His life is without love for his beloved does not show any significance of real life in the sense.

There is no denying the fact that once there was discernment that brought into being popular during the 16^th century in England. It was in fastidious proliferated by the Tudor rulers in order to ensure the prolongation by their rules as the system of kingship was supposed to be fixed by the deity himself where men’s willingness was fake and fabricated. This doctrine affirmed that the king was god specified, self-governing and a direct representative of supernatural being on earth. Therefore under no state of affairs was the king to be aloof, put back as this throne appropriated on this would be alongside the strength of character of God. Once a king was named he was to remain one until he died or usual death and even to step down from the kingship was not permissible.

In his famous book, ‘Troilus and Cressida’ William Shakespeare verbalizes, “Take but degree away, untune that string, And hark, what discord follows” where he sought after to articulate explicitly that for the Elizabethans, the dominion was not minimally a well-designed role where it was a fundamental part of a pecking order predestined by God himself which accommodates the celestial, saintly, human being, mammal and materialistic world. Everything had its selected place in this progression. To dislocate was to provoke pandemonium. The king was God’s right to be heard on earth and whichever attempt to squeeze the throne from him would lead to mayhem and suffice it to pronounce that it was not some far-flung theory which subsequently several Shakespeare’s plays are apprehensive with the remove from power of kings – and that cataclysm perpetually tag along – is a manifestation of the implication of the impression, and of Elizabethan fretfulness about the chain to the queen.

The Elizabethans would have initiated it easier said than done to comprehend Lear’s renunciation. Even of inferior quality was to carve up the kingdom and thus generate scope for potential rivalry: such an accomplishment could not be tolerated by a people for whom the internecine bloodlettings of the wars of the Roses hang about a folk reminiscence. Shakespeare’s social group would understand Lear’s tribulations: a worn-out aged king with no son to succeed to his favorite daughter uncommitted. But they would have distinguished no answer but for the king to endure: God had placed him on the throne and, in the comprehensiveness of time, God would remove him. If they implicit Lear’s dilemma, they would recognize even better the chaos mechanism from his wrong-headed resolution.

There is supplementary delicate standpoint in which we have to view this premise of kingship. The play seems to point toward that the altitude of the throne can distort the person who occupies it. Lear has been congregated for so long with adulation that he can no longer make a distinction connecting sincerity and deception. He has for so long been obeyed in every scrupulous that he cannot stand for the slightest delay in the observance of his wishes. That which in the young king might have been forthright and assertive has now degenerated into the vain, harsh and imperious. It is an inquiring feeling whether it occurs in the case of all leaders, rulers and kings. Perhaps but what we know for certain is that Lear has to undergo an agonized flaking away of accumulated layers of insensitivity and obtuseness before finding himself. Would he have needed to do so if he had been a humble servant rather than a sovereign? It seems by a hair’s breadth likely. Is a king sufferer as able-bodied as a ruler?

Even supposing, misfortunes in King Lear shoots up to a paramount celestial height, the chronicles finds its pedigree in an awful status like run of the mill which envisage the apprehension between parents and grown up children which reflect readers to be more intensive to have eagerness to know the situation ahead. At its simplest, the play concerns itself with the expectations of aged parents and the differing responses of their adult children. Shakespeare’s Macbeth had no doubt about ‘that which should accompany old age’ which he clarifies as ‘tribute, devotion, submission’. King Lear would certainly say amen to that although he would add gratitude. His antagonism with Cordelia stems not only just from mortification and hurt pride, but also from rage at her apparent ungratefulness. As he is progressively broken by Goneril and Regan, his torment resounds on this theme and even until he begins to learn through suffering , Lear’s thoughts are for himself of what his children’s obligations are to him, of what he has done for them and how it should be rewarded. The key problem is that both parents and children are confronting a time of changeover, of exchange of power and authority. The parents are in taking a rain check, the young at the peak of their power and energy. We see two responses from the children. One, from Cordelia and Edgar, is to love and succour their parents, accept their faults, bear no grudge, bide their time. The other, from Goneril, Regan and Edmond, is ruthless, self-centered, annoyed and heavy-handed. The old are past it, no more than an encumbrance and an obstruction. They must be hard-pressed aside and inheritance detained. The best expression of this comes from Edmond, in the words he attributes to Edgar:’ I have heard him of mountain it to be fit that, sons at perfect age, and fathers declined, the father should be as ward to the son and the son manages his revenue’ . Lear, of course, receives similarly short sheriff and In scene iv Goneril speaks repeatedly of his dotage the point is driven home later by Regan. As his daughters strip him of his retinue, Lear brokenly points out’ I gave you all’. The retort expresses well the philosophy of usurping ‘And in the nick of time, you bestow it’ and as such the fool drives home the point:

‘The hedge sparrow fed the cuckoo so long

That it’s hard if head bit off by it young’

Lear, Gloucester and Kent cherish a conservative view in which family bonds, commitment, amazement and reverence for pecking order are paramount: Gloucester, surveying the crumbling of Lear’s world and his own, laments: “We have seen the best of our time, Edmond, Goneril and Regan are the hard-headed, clear-sighted progressive – modernists who have no time for antiquated ideas. They are of today and the future, ordering their lives and very much in charge of their fate. The conflicting attitudes of the children reach their apotheoses dramatically. Goneril and Regan combine to break their father; Edmond contributes to the blinding of Gloucester. Nothing will be allowed to stand in their way. A corresponding apotheosis restores the old values; when Edgar leads his blinded father to some retrieval of hope and happiness, when cordelia reassures the bewildered Lear, they are not being obedient, not responding to any hierarchical imperative. They are simply expressing a love, loyalty and regard too strong to have been undermined by the rash misjudgment of their father.

This straightforward fiction of two impulsion aged men, betrayed by self-interested progeny and redeemed by the feelings of affection for of a wronged child, has a widespread significance. As children we have got to all come to terms with our attitudes to our parents, to their and our shifting needs. As parents we must brazen out the fact that our children will outgrow us and supersede. It is evident that there is no easy answer, no superficial ethics. conceivably, however, we learn with Lear and Gloucester , Cordelia and Edgar, that the old must not anticipate to receive all, must continue to give, to realize to learn- and the young must hold out care for and respect for as long as we are concerned with or for craving to receive in question. Things cannot be hurried for which it is universally noted that ripeness is all.

Not only in King Lear, had he written many tragedy plays where has he enlightened the problems, love and enmity of human beings. In Hamlet, he had added the beauty of Hamlet with nature and supernatural aspects. In this book, he had used many literary techniques like simile, metaphor and soliloquy with which he led his pen about Hamlet with unbounded courage and hardihood. When Hamlet came to learn the death news of his father, he became amazing and he was also surprised that his mother had married his uncle Claudius. By supernatural aspects of his father’s ghostly sprits, he learnt about the conspiracy of his uncle and mother and as such he promised to revenge against the murder of his father. William Shakespeare very nicely represented the character of Hamlet and finally he became successful when Hamlet had had his revenge at last against his uncle and mother.

All the way through suffering, Lear learns a new ethical view of his life and human relationship with one another specifically if the relation is framed with close human ties. According to him, it is a judgment nowhere in signal in early stages of the play, which develop in a mood of ruthless materialism, of that which can be counted and measured. Gloucester and Kent have a discussion of the sharing out of the kingdom; Lear wants his daughters to express the dimensions of their love; the actual number of knights becomes a crucial symbol of self-hood. A man it appears is what he owns, an expression of his belongings having stressed by his daughters into justifying his needs for a retinue, Lear’s speech beginning ‘O reason not the need’ is magnificently moved, but cracks down in confusion. He seems to be asserting that man needs superfluous items in order to mark him off from animals, but the line of thought will not hold. It is, in any case a view that he will draw closer to discard.

It is throughout the storm that Lear loses his footing towards a conception of what a man really is, what his true needs are. From uncontrolled against charlatan, he turns to sympathy for the unrehearsed -‘meager nude wretches’ before becoming one himself by dragging off his clothes in emulation of poor Tom. He, by his cosmopolitan outlook enunciates through the world of surface impressions: he recognizes and expresses that he is one of the lowliest. Lear continues to learn of keen necessity of honesty, sincerity, simplicity and openness. It is a theme which culminates in his in his reunion with Cordelia and particularly in his birds in the cage speech. The important thing is to be with those one loves and trusts, to seek and offer forgiveness as may be necessitated to make merriments to each other company. And regarding the justice of human beings, we find in King Lear that the wealthy and mighty don’t guarantee even handed justice; those with the whip-hand of power and authority often abuse it. Considering Lear’s trial of his daughter’s affection his disgusting punishment of Cordelia and Kent; the flaying of Lear and Gloucester by the newly installed high and mighty; the cruel death of Cordelia. The demented trial of scene iii act vi some how projects deceptiveness of it all, while Lear’s eruption in scene IV against the rascal beadle and robes and furred gowns is a fulminating attack on evil motives virtually. Gloucester contributes to this understanding in that his blinding, by rich and elevated is a catalyst which simply attracts goodness from the ordinary servants and the old man who guides him. This is why like Lear he comes to see the importance of sharing affluence and ruination excess. The best certification of righteousness seems to lie not in setting one man over another, but in mutual sympathy and regard for each others dignity and needs. As we are to conjecture that lusting after riches and belongings is eventually self slaughter and severe death of Cornwall, Goneril, Regan, and Edmond seem to peak to this. On the other hand, Lear and Gloucester- two old men who suffer and loss so much –seem in a sense to be triumphant, for they achieve some grasp of man’s need for outspokenness, justice truth, absolution and love.

In his literary creation, he had shown that over ambitious in life is a dangerous thing. In Julius Caesar, Brutus was an over ambitious person and he had a long cherished desire to become a king over night. But after killing the king Caesar, he had been cut into pieces let alone being the king. Similarly, Macbeth was over ambitious but his consequence was very fatal. He had written a number of historic plays and romantic comedy. In all of his creation, he was second to none in creating history in English literature by his unbounded race towards the reforms process of human defects and the maxim of nature.